|
| |
Reviewed by: Suad
Bejtovic, Bosnian Movie Critic
Directed by:
Robert Zemeckis
Starring:
Harrison Ford, Michele Pfeifer
| . |
|
The bigger the names, as it sometimes
happens, the worse the movie. Two of the movie icons of the 80s have rarely been as bad as
they are now, on the threshold of the century. Harrison Ford, the actor behind the two
coolest movie characters of all time, Indiana Jones and Han Solo, gets a badly written
role of Norman Spencer, a workaholic husband too overwhelmed to notice his wife's (Michele
Pfeiffer) emotional crisis. Robert Zemeckis, the man behind such movies as "Back To
The Future" and "Forrest Gump", tries his luck in horror, and borrows from
the best, but borrows poorly. His attempts to make sense of the story fail so miserably
that it seems like What Lies Beneath is actually two movies, with one abandoned half-way,
replaced at the last minute with the other. Norman and
Claire are living in a pristine Vermont scenery, when their new neighbors start behaving
strangely. He is too busy to notice anything, but her long lonesome hours are playing mind
games with her, and she thinks there may be some foul play involved. She suspects the
neighbor killed his wife and spies on him with binoculars (Hitchcock alert!). When Claire
starts experiencing ghost presence in the house, she believes the ghost to be the
neighbor's murdered wife, and is trying to alert Norman. He is not only uninterested and
unconvinced, he deduces that she needs therapy (another Hitchcock alert!). At the turning
point of the movie, when one movie ends and the other begins, we'll discover that the
ghost is not the neighbor's wife after all, but rather a certain young lady Norman had an
affair with (Amber Valetta). The chilling resolution scene takes place in a bathroom - get
ready for another Hitchcock alert - and the shower curtain won't be the only victim of
events that ensue.
All
these quotes of the great master of suspense might have worked, if Zemeckis had a script
to work with. This one is so unsure of what it wants to say, it tries to develop one story
as a decoy, so you don't see the other coming, but both are equally unimaginative. Even if
the second story weren't so aggressively advertised, you'd still be wondering what the
link between them is. In fact, the funniest moment of the movie is the final
reconciliation with the story about the neighbors. Michele Pfeiffer tries real hard to
make sense of what's going on, and she's done an admirable job, given the fact that she
spends half the movie submerged into various bodies of water. Small clues that the movie
leaves for us like Hansel and Gretel, such as the key, the pendant or the powerful
tranquilizer, take away any surprises, but somewhat help the flow of the movie. The
dialogues are brainless at best, and a few scares that the movie does deliver are
overshadowed by several really cheap ones, that are just a little bit overdone.
|
Film | Music | Travel | Photos | Texas Express | Email |
Home
©
1999-2000 www.suad.com All Rights Reserved.
|